|
''Mathews v. Eldridge'', , is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that individuals have a statutorily granted property right in Social Security benefits, that the termination of those benefits implicates due process, but that the termination of those benefits does not necessarily require a pre-termination hearing. The case is significant in the development of American administrative law. ==Legal principles== In determining the amount of process due, the court should weigh three factors: # The interests of the individual in retaining their property, and the injury threatened by the official action #The risk of error through the procedures used and probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; #The costs and administrative burden of the additional process, and the interests of the government in efficient adjudication Social security benefits are a statutorily created property right implicating due process. Termination of social security benefits does not require a pre-termination hearing. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Mathews v. Eldridge」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|